Was this unique in the sense that Boeing patched the software without a mandatory training on the changelog?Īs we ask further and more specific questions, we can get somewhere. Was this unique in the sense that Boeing first contracted out software development with this model? Was this unique in the sense that Boeing released a new system of software on a plane? Was there any substantial difference in the 737 Max or its training that Boeing had not done before? It's particularly problematic in an industry (aviation) where the road from development to profitable product is so long. Henry Ford knew this, for example (for all his faults, which were considerable). One can be extremely successful while producing not only with an eye toward those profits but also toward a social vision. This ethos is a long time in the making, the elevation above all else of making money. It's just the fixation on the next quarter's profits, as opposed to the long-term vision in which a business shepherds their product with a primary eye on the decades ahead instead of an immediate result. I don't think the shortsightedness is anything to do with capitalism, per se. It was greedy executives doing shortsighted things to pad their pockets.” They started tying executive bonuses to stock performance. “The Boeing Company for a good part of a century was the foremost and best airplane manufacturer in the world, but they got infected. Maybe not so different than a lot of business corporations these days - capitalism gone awry? Bigger profits? Shorter term profits?īoeing's 737 Max is a saga of capitalism gone awry
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |